I am uploading here a guest comment as a blog-post as it concerns a person - Prof. Shyama Prasad Ganguly - who is my close friend and co-author and also because it relates to questions of integrity in artistic production. - Indranil
Dear lead pair: you made my eyes leak. A prominent English
daily on March 3, 2014, carried a photo of that riveting Bengali play Khaila, scripted by the outstanding playwright
Sisir Kumar Das, directed by the brilliant director Shamu Ganguly. The photo, taken at one of the
several stagings of Khaila
in New Delhi years
ago (produced by Bikalpa), repackages it here as ‘a scene from Khel,’ where ‘Khel’ is ‘A Play in Hindi….By
Averee Chaurey and team, New Delhi.’ The problem with this is two-fold.
a) That it is untrue.
(The image is a scene from the Bengali Khaila,
and not the Hindi Khel, since Khel was yet to be staged at the time of
this article).
b) That it is
unethical. (To omit altogether the name and the role of the Director of the
original play, of which this is but a translation).
That this team
manages to expound on their abundant influences and inspirations that culminate
in Khel, without a mention of the
Director who's labor and artistry shaped the
very characters that the Hindi version would be re-delivering – is
jaw-dropping. It is
jaw-dropping for reasons and concerns of ethics, honesty and integrity that
will be self-evident to most artists. It is tear-inducing, however, for reasons
that cannot even be described.
For days and weeks
and months, and months together, the Director of the original Khaila reflected on the script in order
to sculpt the characters of the elderly couple that are now playing Khel (game, if you like). The profoundly stirring script by
Sisir Kumar Das met the immense work and thought invested by Shamu Ganguly in
mounting the play that moved audiences. You will know best the painstaking emotional
and physical mentoring that was involved in shaping the characters that you
play in the Hindi Khel. Better than
anyone else, you will know that this was accomplished over years, and over the
course of some sixteen productions across India. Is it all a blur? Like looking
through those hyperbolic, cloudy glasses that your character was made to wear in
Khaila (an exemplary directorial
touch in and of itself, where the old, lonely, desperate, neglected, mother deceives
herself into believing that the glasses would correct her failing sight and
pathetic life, knowing the whole time that it corrected nothing)? What is it
that leads you to make such a colossal omission in presenting and announcing Khel?
Let us, for a moment,
gloss over the most obvious purpose with which such omissions are usually made.
Let’s pick another, more generous one; one that doesn’t entirely fracture my conviction
in people and the human relationships that they are out to build through art. Could
it be, perhaps, an over-identification with the theme of the play itself - the
deplorable reality of parents, mentors, best cut off and forgotten? There
couldn’t be a better way of doing poetic justice to the very plot of the play.
As I read about all
the publicity of Khel – ‘a play by
Averee Chaurey’ (a truth that only the imagination may grasp) - I cannot help
but wonder what a visionary Sisir Kumar Das was, to nail down so precisely through
his script this ever-shrinking space for human
sentiments such as dignity, grace and gratefulness. Off-stage, you show it
best.
Ritika
No comments:
Post a Comment